Barbora Krejcikova vs Alexandra Eala Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 01 Jul at 12:56 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
B. Krejcikova vs A. Eala

CZE
1
Win
Played
0
Win

PHI
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Krejcikova 1 - 0 Eala
They have played 3 sets in total, with Barbora Krejcikova winning 2 and Alexandra Eala winning 1. The last match between Barbora Krejcikova and Alexandra Eala was at the Wimbledon - London, 01-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Grass, with Barbora Krejcikova getting the victory 3-6 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Krejcikova | 1 |
| Eala | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Wimbledon - London(07-01-25)
B. Krejcikova vs A. Eala H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $10,024,785 | Career Prize Money | $599,467 |
| 64.75% (428-233) | Career Total W/L | 62.38% (194-117) |
| 1 | Grass | 0 |
| 22 | Titles | 6 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 64.00% (16-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.00% (13-13) |
B. Krejcikova vs A. Eala Match Preview:
- Which player has an edge in second serve performance? Krejcikova, with 43.79% of points won on their second serve in recent form, surpasses Eala's 39.18%.
- In terms of returning opponents' second serves, Eala slightly leads, winning 50.21% compared to Krejcikova's 49.4%.
- When facing first serves, Eala outperforms Krejcikova, with 35.46% of returns won versus Krejcikova's 28.08%.
- Under pressure, Eala has shown better resilience, saving 47.64% of breakpoints, compared to Krejcikova's 41.67%.
- Overall match win rates in the past year are nearly identical, with Krejcikova having a W/L of 17/10 and Eala at 47/28.
- On specific surfaces, Krejcikova excels on clay with a 70% win rate, whereas this is Eala's weakest surface.
- Eala's strongest performance is on grass, with a 68% win rate, while Krejcikova is less successful on hard courts.
- Krejcikova competes mainly at Grand Slam events, boasting an 81.82% win rate, whereas Eala primarily excels at Challenger/ITF tournaments with a 65.85% win rate.
- Analysis of opponent quality indicates Krejcikova faces stronger competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 69.7 compared to Eala's average of 199.23.
- In deciding sets, Krejcikova has a distinct advantage, winning 78% of such scenarios, while Eala has won 48%.
- Krejcikova's breakpoint conversion rate is also higher at 55.17%, compared to Eala's 45.59%.
Editorial Prediction (July 1, 2025, UTC):
Krejcikova's superior performance in critical areas gives her a significant edge in the upcoming match. Her second serve effectiveness and success in converting breakpoints mark her as a dominant force.
Although Eala demonstrates strength in returning first serves and saving breakpoints, Krejcikova's experience on grander stages and ability to perform under pressure, especially shown in deciding sets, are crucial factors.
Realistically, Krejcikova's exposure to tougher competition and higher success rate at Grand Slam-level events suggest she has the upper hand. Therefore, based on the statistics and performance metrics, Krejcikova is likely to emerge victorious in this match.
Barbora Krejcikova vs Alexandra Eala Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
B. Krejcikova vs A. Eala H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 9 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:10:0 | Average Match Time | 2:10:0 |
| 68% (63/93) | 1st Serve % | 54% (50/92) |
| 62% (39/63) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (25/50) |
| 53% (16/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (21/42) |
| 38% (6/16) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (3/9) |
| 50% (46/92) | Return Points Win % | 41% (38/93) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
B. Krejcikova Recent Matches Played
A. Eala Recent Matches Played

B. Krejcikova vs A. Eala Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64.75% (428/233) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.38% (194/117) |
| 61.93% (932/573) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.44% (443/290) |
| 55.77% (7622/6044) | Games Win/Loss | 54.03% (3616/3076) |
| 59.01% (131/91) | Hard Win/Loss | 65.33% (130/69) |
| 69.64% (234/102) | Clay Win/Loss | 40.00% (14/21) |
| 59.09% (39/27) | Indoor Hard W/L | 64.81% (35/19) |
| 64.86% (24/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 65.22% (15/8) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 1285 | Aces Total | 354 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.38 |
| 1764 | Total Double Faults | 1256 |
| 1:10:42 | Average Match Time | 1:43:38 |
| 448.12 | Average Opponent Rank | 361.22 |
| 62% (19683/31530) | 1st Serve % | 62% (13184/21413) |
| 66% (12951/19683) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (8021/13184) |
| 46% (5491/11832) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (3848/8229) |
| 48% (1874/3934) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (1400/2830) |
| 45% (14409/31931) | Return Points Win % | 48% (10124/21252) |
| 65.69% (67/35) | Slam W/L | 43.75% (7/9) |
| 52.00% (39/36) | Masters W/L | 35.00% (7/13) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60.95% (103/66) | Main Tour W/L | 59.09% (26/18) |
| 63.35% (121/70) | Challenger W/L | 66.51% (141/71) |
| 80.67% (96/23) | Futures W/L | 68.42% (13/6) |
| 65% (419/649) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (190/307) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 49% (68/139) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (40/70) |
| 56% (107/190) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (53/109) |
| 88% (428/376) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (203/165) |
| 12% (428/51) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (203/38) |
| 21% (233/50) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (108/29) |